Posted on

Stop Imitating! Finding India’s True Self

A man with a severe tooth ache goes to the dentist, who upon examining the tooth, assures the man that the problem wasn’t anything serious and that a simple procedure performed under a local anesthesia would help repair the damage. Upon hearing this, the man gets very upset and  tells the dentist, “What? Local anesthesia? You think I cannot afford a foreign one?! I demand an  imported one!”

I heard this tale first some decades ago and it served to highlight, in a tongue in cheek manner, the Indian’s obsession with all things foreign while also showcasing the lack of awareness of what a local anesthesia was.

This obsession with the imported and  the foreign should have lessened, one would have imagined, after over 20 years of economic liberalization. Yet, Chidanand Rajghattta writing about Ang Lee winning the Best Director Oscar for “Life of Pi” in the Times of India – Feb 16th 2013 – had this to say “It was a big moment for Lee, but a bigger moment for his Indian fans when he ended his acceptance speech with a “Namaste”” Really? Indians felt pride, according to the writer because Ang Lee said “Namaste”?!

There’s a big lesson for Indian entrepreneurs. A lesson involving self-esteem, capability, the confidence and courage of one’s own convictions.  An entrepreneur cannot solve problems by just seeking inspiration, affirmation and trivial acknowledgement from elsewhere without the passionate driving  self-belief, a deep understanding of the problems to be solved and a gathering of insight.  Therefore, blindly copying models from elsewhere, by only reading about startups and startup ecosystems  in  advanced economies and  thereafter slavishly attempting to adopt those offerings and even behavior  without adding any real original material of one’s own is a recipe for tragic disaster. Imitation is the best form of flattery, and indeed homage, to the original; the imitator is, at best, tolerated but never respected for there’s no original contribution on offer that’s worth recognizing, just a momentary quick-fix solution. Many companies and entrepreneurs – even countries (think Taiwan and China) – start off imitating but then, the successful ones, move rapidly to invest in creating the infrastructure to develop the insights and then execute relentlessly to offer unique solutions to their problems.

Shekhar Gupta, Editor in Chief at The Indian Express, talking to Steven Spielberg is quoted thus “Walking down Champs-Elysees, I was very happy to see a hoarding for an Indian film which described the director as India’s Tarantino”.  So, what about an American director being described as America’s Anurag Kashyap? When will that happen? Should that happen and is that a desirable goal? What will it take to make that happen? So, rather than have debates and discussions around these questions, we bask in the pitiable glory of being second hand?

Shekhar Gupta goes on to say, “I would like to express a wish to you. …… So why don’t you come to India and do an epic on anybody—Buddha, Ashoka, Chandragupta, Akbar, Gandhi, Nehru—we have many themes and stories for you. But it needs a Spielberg to come and do justice to it.”

And how does Spielberg respond?  “I think it needs an Indian director to tell those stories and maybe I could help in the background” How big a tragedy is it when we are so eager to outsource the telling of our own stories and history? What does it say about us? What does it reveal about our lack of self-belief, the infrastructure, the competence, the capacity?

Since we learn and react only to what outsiders have to say, perhaps the following will be instructive.

Eric Schmidt, Executive Chairman of Google, on a recent visit to India said “The most striking Indian internet ……….. will come from Indians solving local problems. We know that India’s internet infrastructure allows Indian engineers to solve the problems of small businesses in other countries. If India plays its cards right, we’ll soon see Indian engineers and Indian small businesses tackling Indian problems first, then exporting the solutions that work best.” For India to play its cards right, it must first recognize that it has the cards and can learn to play its own game!

Drew Olanoff writing in Techcrunch on recent visit had this to say “If a country like India can stop worrying about being like Silicon Valley and find its true self, there could be a new RedBus every other week. It’s moonshot thinking, of course, but that’s what it takes”.

Finding its true self  – that’s a challenge for Indian entrepreneurs and for those involved in the growth of the Indian entrepreneurial ecosystem. Shall we all rise to the occasion now that there’s endorsement from outside?

Posted on

Quick Research / Usability Methods: Heuristic Evaluation

(Post 2 of a series on quick research and usability techniques. Start-up’s can use these techniques fairly easily to connect to and understand their end users better, as well as maintain usability standards on their products.)

In my last post, I introduced a discount usability engineering method called the ‘Expert Usability Review’ – A method best suited to start-up’s who have access to skilled and experienced usability / design professionals who can conduct a Usability Review.

Post 2 introduces a related technique called the ‘Heuristic Evaluation’.
Start up’s that don’t have a usability / design team in place, can start focusing on usability and ease of use, using the ‘Heuristic Evaluation’ method – A method with similar goals to the Expert Usability Review, but a relatively easier starting point for novice researchers.

In a Heuristic Evaluation (or Heuristic Review), the reviewers identify issues by looking at an interface in context to a pre-decided set of heuristics. Violations to any of the heuristics indicate non-compliance / potential usability issues.

‘Heuristics’ are rules of thumb – Broader than design guidelines, typically available as self-sufficient ‘sets’ (e.g. Nielsen’s 10 Usability Heuristics / Gerhardt-Powals’ cognitive engineering principles) that can be used standalone / along with other sets.

Popular examples:

Visibility of system status: The system should always keep users informed about what is going on, through appropriate feedback within reasonable time. (Jakob Nielsen)

Reduce uncertainty: Display data in a manner that is clear and obvious. (Gerhardt-Powals)

The set of heuristics used act as a guideline – making this method more of a check list based audit rather than requiring reviewers to intuitively identify issues by drawing upon a deep knowledge of usability and UI in general.

(More about the technique and how to conduct Heuristic Evaluations at Usability.gov, Smashing Magazine and the NN Group)

One of the drawbacks of the Heuristic Evaluation method, is that the issues identified are dependent on the list of heuristics used. So if the set of heuristics is too narrow, there is a chance of some issues going unidentified. On the other hand, if the list of heuristics is very large, the review would take a very long time to do.

The most popular set of Heuristics are Jakob Nielson’s 10 Heuristics. However, these are broad guidelines – and may be too abstract for a lay person to interpret and apply.

10 Usability HeuristicsThe 275 Web Usability Guidelines from User Focus are more literal and therefore much easier to understand for the lay person. Moreover, these guidelines are available in a neat Excel spread sheet format that includes instructions on how to use them and an auto-calculated numeric rating for guidelines compliance.

275 Web Usability Guidelines


 

To end, here are a few tips you can keep in mind while attempting to do a Heuristic Evaluation:

Start with a Knowledge Transfer
Before critiquing a product, it is important to understand its context and usage.
The knowledge transfer must enable a good understanding of the product strategy and goals, target audience, known trouble points, constraints and design centres. The KT must include a walkthrough of all features, screens and task flows that are critical to the product.

Define the scope of the review
While this is not necessary for a simple product or a product with a manageable number of screens, in a complex or large product, defining the key task flows and screens to be reviewed is important to keep the review manageable.
With some exceptions, the 80 /20 rule is a good way to do this – Attempt to review 20% of the product features that are used 80% of the time.

Select the set of heuristics that are right for your product
There are plenty of heuristics available online.
Keeping n mind the product you plan to review, it is important to decide whether to use a generic set of heuristics (Like Jacob Nielson’s 10 Heuristics / User Focus guidelines) or whether domain specific / niche heuristics would be more effective. In niche or highly targeted products (products for senior citizens, children, disabled users, mobile phone hardware etc.) generic heuristics may be ineffective for unearthing all issues.

Select a set of heuristics that are right for the reviewer
The reviewers who are going to be using the heuristics, need to be comfortable / familiar with the heuristics in order to interpret and apply them effectively.

Focus on issue identification vs. recommendation
A common tendency among newbie reviewers is to jump right into fixing the problem / wording the issue as a recommendation. It is important to keep the Heuristic Review focused on issue identification, in context to a given set of heuristics. In fact, an issue may / may not be accompanied by a corresponding recommendation – Issues are sometimes too complex to be tackled by a quick written recommendation and need a larger, more focused redesign effort.

Rate issues to help prioritize
Doing this helps focus the post review effort of addressing the issues identified through Heuristic Review.

Are you a design thinker evangelizing or facilitating user research and usability methods within your start-up?
We would love to hear about your experience / answer any questions that you have about the methods that you used.

Post 3 coming up soon, will showcase a Guerrilla Research technique – Remote Usability Testing. Look out for this post to learn more about the method and to compare the issues found through Usability Testing, against issues identified through the Expert Usability Review.

We invite members of the start-up community to volunteer their screens / functions for use as examples in upcoming posts showcasing additional research techniques. Email me  at devika(at)anagramresearch.com to check whether your screen is eligible for selection.  

Posted on

Where is Dropbox headed?

Having started in September 2008, Dropbox today is a leading cloud storage provider (CSP). It has over a 100 million signed free users and about 4 million paid users (4% conversion rate as quoted often by Houston). Assuming the lowest payment tier (100GB at $99 per year), this translates into annual revenue of about $400 million. Based on Amazon S3 costing and estimates of Dropbox employee costs, the EBITDA works out to $250 million. Its costs are always going down and its revenues are always going up. The company is valued at $ 4 billion. Dropbox is making money hand over fist. Right? But consider this –

It now has more than ten competitors several with deep pockets e.g., Amazon CloudDrive, Apple iCloud, Google GoogleDrive, Microsoft Skydrive, Box, Spideroak, Ubuntu One, MediaFire, Mega.  Its other competitors, purely in enterprise space include HP Cloud Objects, Rackspace etc.

Dropbox offers the smallest free quota – 2GB plus referral bonus. All its competitors offer 5GB or more (Skydrive -7GB, MediaFire and Mega – 50 GB).

Dropbox pricing is probably the highest ($99 for 100GB). For same capacity, competitor prices are much lower –CloudDrive ($50), GoogleDrive ($60), Skydrive ($50). Box ($480), iCloud ($160). Spideroak ($100) have a higher pricing but have more powerful features (see below).

Dropbox is merely a folder service. Its competitors have other value-adds and lock-in mechanisms. For example, iCloud allows streaming of music, apps, books, and TV shows you purchase from the iTunes store, Google and Microsoft have GoogleDocs and Office WebApps respectively. Documents created through these apps do not count towards the drive quota. Box is designed more as a business-collaboration and work-flow solution that a CSP. SpiderOak is the only service that offers data encryption before your data hits their servers. Perhaps, acquisition of AudioGalaxy should enable Dropbox with music streaming feature.

The  giants like Apple, Google, Amazon and Microsoft see storage as a way to lure customers into their respective cloud and then “upsell” them on higher-level and more profitable services that they have in the portfolio. They have been aggressive in launching or responding to price cuts from competitors. Dropbox cannot win against these Goliaths in the theatre of feature and price wars.

The Dropbox differentiator was the near seamless experience backing up and syncing files to cloud on multiple platforms. That differentiator is rapidly evaporating with the competitors catching up. Moreover, what happens if all your files are already in the cloud for example music (iCloud, Spotify), Documents (GoogleDocs, Office 365), Pictures (Instagram) and so on. There are umpteen such scenarios that make Dropbox redundant.

I am sure Dropbox product managers are having sleepless nights. Do you have a product strategy and roadmap for Dropbox’s future?

Posted on

Why #Hashtags are the future of monetizing social media

You can’t invite people to a party and try to sell them stuff. Pretty much every starry-eyed startup that went after eyeballs gets it by now. Over the last seven years the web has moved away from a consumption medium (think NY times) to a creation-consumption medium (think Twitter, Facebook). But we’ve been very tardy in reshaping business models for this new model of the web. Interestingly, the solution to this monetization problem may lie with a small insignificant key on your keyboard. Read on.

Why are we failing at monetization today?

Traditional online media worked on a Pipe model, targeted only consumers and got away with monetizing eyeballs. Social media works on the Platform model, supports both creators and consumers, and has tellingly failed with trying the same old monetization strategies. 

Media Monetization 101

The monetization of any form of media is driven by mining of context and using that (or some other consumer action) as a proxy for intent. Advertisers then pay to have their ads matched with the right intent. Here are a few examples:

Keywords on a page: Context E.g. AdSense

Search query: Intent E.g. AdWords

Location: Context E.g. FourSquare

Monetization works by harvesting user intent and serving messages/information relevant to that intent. The better you are at harvesting intent, the more effective your monetization is going to be. 

Why is this model breaking down?

Mining context and intent goes for a toss in the world of social platforms. Users are the new content creators and content isn’t necessarily structured. With the older media model, the content creators (typically the media houses) were creating content to cater to search engines. The content was designed for text mining algorithms right at the point of production. With social media, the creators of content (all of us) don’t care about structure. In fact, online conversations are getting more unstructured by the day. Consequently, mining these conversations for context and intent is a crazy task, riddled with false positives. And false positives always lead to spam.

This is why the Hashtag is so important to the future of the web. 

Enter the Hashtag

Engineers would like to be known for the tech innovations that they engineered but Chris Messina will probably go down in history as the guy whose random blog post helped structure a new era of media. In a 2007 post, Messina suggested the use of Hashtags for the first time for Twitter.

This week, Facebook rolled out Hashtags.

It’s interesting to revisit that original blog post and figure out how Platform Thinking is so rare (and important) and how most of us just prefer to think in Pipes. 

Hashtags and Platform Thinking

If you think of media as a Pipe where content creators create stuff and push it out for us to consume, the content creator takes great pains to structure the content. Every piece of content will be carefully drafted in a category, will be peppered with keywords for search engines to gobble and will be structured so that the context can be easily mined.

If you look at the proposals from Stephanie and Brian, they advocate the use of pre-defined groups to regulate conversations around certain contexts. This is a typical Pipe Thinking model. Provide the constraints and force the creators to work within those constraints. It works very well when media is created within the boundaries of a firm.

When media is created by users, as it is today, one cannot afford to think in terms of constraints anymore. This is where Messina’s advocacy of the Hashtag is so brilliant. If you’re thinking in terms of Platforms, you’d want to make the creation process as easy as possible for users, yet ensure that they leave you with enough hints around intent and context. This is what Flickr did when it allowed users to tag pictures instead of forcing them to fit pictures into pre-defined categories. This is what Messina advocates in this post when he argues against users having to operate within groups and allows users to define context and intent on the fly.

Through Hashtags!

Top-down classification and forcing creators to fit within categories or groups is a hangover from Pipe Thinking; an editorial view of the web. A social view of the web requires a more bottom-up approach.

If you think of the social web as a flow of information, pre-defined categories and groups limit the channels in which information can flow. Hashtags, instead, allow creation of channels on the fly to suit the needs of the information creator. 

If you’re still thinking Semantic search alone, you’re in the wrong game

When the world first saw an explosion of user-generated content, people realized that Google’s keyword and link-driven approach to ranking information wasn’t going to work forever. Semantic search was hailed as the next savior.

I have nothing against semantic search. I just believe algorithms are still fairly limited in mining human intent from unstructured conversations. And the web is gradually, but definitively, moving towards unstructured conversations.

The solution to mining unstructured information doesn’t lie in creation of more sophisticated algorithms alone. It lies in, first, solving the problem at the point of production and allowing the new creators to easily append some structure to the information.

That is exactly what the Hashtag does!

If you’re building a platform that enables and promotes unstructured conversations, and you want to go beyond just being a communication tool, to creating a corpus of sticky content, hashtags can help transform unstructured conversations to structure, right at the source.

Tweetable Takeaways

Hashtags are the new keywords, and the key to monetizing social media.

Tags are the new categories, hashtags are the new keywords!

This article was first featured on Sangeet’s blog, Platform Thinking (http://platformed.info). Platform Thinking has been ranked among the top blogs for startups, globally, by the Harvard Business School Centre for Entrepreneurship

Posted on

8 Truths why IT Services Organizations cannot do Software Products

The bread and butter of the Indian IT Industry has been IT Services.  IT Services, as the terminology implies, is servicing a customer.  A customer states his needs, the IT Services organization makes a proposal to develop / maintain / re-engineer / etc., and the deal is done.  As offshoring and outsourcing has matured, customers have become savvy and are putting pressure on IT Services Organizations to compete more aggressively, provide more value and make cheaper proposals with no hidden costs to customers.

IT Services Organizations are in turn looking for ways to improve their margins by creating their own Intellectual Property (IP) and some of them have turned to building or investing in software products.

This articles core purpose is to warn leaders in IT Services Organizations – “DON’T BUILD SOFTWARE PRODUCTS”.  But success makes one arrogant, so I suspect some leaders will still build their own products, in which case hire somebody who has made these mistakes before and is familiar with the 8 Truths.

TRUTH 1: Trusting your best IT SERVICES Manager to build your Product

When an IT Services Organization decides to do Products, it is one of their significant investments and guess who they put in charge of it – one of their better managers.  A manager in an IT Services Organization is an expert at – scope management, cost management, SDLC, resource management, status reporting, financial management, etc.. And of course he is very good at managing other managers.

Building successful products has little to do with the above skills.  Building successful software products requires the ability to provide vision for the Product, ability to work with changing customer and market needs, the ability to build and trash architectures, deal with failures, inspire creativity, identify opportunities you had not seen before.

Most importantly, if you decide to build software Products please find a Software Product Head who has a couple of failures under his belt.  And if you find one that hasn’t yet failed, guess what – he will fail on your Software Product !!!

TRUTH 2 : IT SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS serve Customers and their Projects

The real expertise of a successful IT Services Organization is Scope Management – negotiating successfully with the customer on agreed scope and what is not in scope.  If you are the Program Manager and your team is on the wrong track or if you have made a mistake, you are taught to revisit the scope.  Examine the scope document with a fine toothcomb to compare what the customer asked for with what you have delivered.

If the customer says “The system is not easy to use” then examine the scope to say “Yes, but we did not agree on usability guidelines”, so if you now need “Usability”, it’s a change request and please Mr. Customer, do pay for it.

If the customer says “The system is too slow and it takes 45 seconds for my Employee Screen to come up” then examine the scope document for “Performance Requirements” and tell the customer “Oops !! Mr. Customer you seem to have missed defining Performance Requirements” and what you are asking for is a major redesign.  Guess who’s gonna shell out big bucks for it?!

Customer: “The database design is bad”.  IT Service: “That is not a deliverable as per scope”.

Customer: “The coding guidelines are poor”.  IT Services: “We follow our organization standard guidelines, if you need anything different it’s not in scope”.

… and so on.

Importantly, the cost of changes and mistakes is either borne by customers or at least shared by them.

In the Software Product world there is limited Customer defined scope and there is no fallback position to ask a customer to pay for mistakes.  If you have got it wrong, bad luck. Do it again and by the way do it better.  And please meet “implicit needs of the product” – customers implicitly expect a Software Product to load within 5 seconds and the usability to be impeccable and intuitive.

This is a culture shift for an IT Services Organization.

TRUTH 3: IT SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS don’t know when to say STOP

IT Services thinking:  If we got it wrong, lets change the manager, lets change the technical architect, lets change the Business Analyst.  Or better still … lets throw more people at it, lets change the location of development, lets get more funding.

How about just stopping and starting again.

IT Services Organizations just don’t know how to stop or setup metrics to stop.  IT Software Products have high failure rates – over 80%.  The IT Services Organization is used to 80% success rate.  It’s a another  culture shift.

This is also related to how Software Services Projects and Software Products are funded.  A Customer Services Project even if gone bad often continues to be a revenue earner, till the customer decides to stop development.  An investor in a Software Product organization often invests in multiple Product companies and has clear criteria to continue or stop.

In Software Products there is little room for carrying baggage and making incremental changes.  If you have got your product wrong, throw it away and restart or just stop.  Any kind of incremental changes cost a lot and makes the whole team slower.  Your technical team also knows they are building an elephant which will not be nimble, flexible, easy to change or responsive.  There is no greater demotivator than a technical team that doesn’t believe in the Product.

A Software Product is developing IP for the future – there will be peaks and troughs of investments and returns and these will typically be in separate time-cycles.  This is another reason, why an IT Services organization just doesn’t know when to say STOP.  They may well invest much more than a pure-play Software Product Organization would and that too for poorer returns.

TRUTH 4: IT SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS have Forgotten how to BUILD SOFTWARE

IT Services Senior leadership is chosen for Customer Engagement skills, for P&L responsibility, and not for Product vision.

If you are in IT Services, when you resource for a Customer Services Project, you pull out your Gross Margin sheet and see what level of senior / junior people you are allowed.  You then go to your Resource Management team to help you fill those resources.  You could need a team of 20 or a team of 200, depending on the size and complexity.  And that is your focus.

When you develop a Software Product, you first review the market of the Product, then you review its features, then you validate it with some customers, then you do prototypes and proof of concepts, then you validate it again with customers.  You convince an anchor customer.  Your entire focus is on – are the features right, is my customer happy, is my software maintainable, will I get references to other customers?  Resources and budgets are just as important but features and benefits to customers come first.

When a Software Product organization scales the problems grow differently – what is the scope of my product, what are the analysts saying about it, how will my licensing model work for small and large customers, how will I support customers, what is their upgrade path,  are there core architectural bottlenecks that will prevent the software from scaling?

The priority for an IT Services Organization remains quality of service, size of business, revenue and margins as it should.  IT Services Organizations do not know how to build software any more.  They knew it once – now they have forgotten.

TRUTH 5: IT SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS’ HR works on scale and size.  They cannot focus on the problem of 1 Employee

The HR team of an IT Services organization has a very clear idea of where and how to recruit, what compensation to give, how to give raises, how to be fair across thousands of people.    There are employee benefits, training programs, career growth plans, dual shore movement, etc.

Product teams start by being small teams.  They often need expertise in small bursts – speed is everything.  An IT Services Organization just doesn’t have the flexibility and nimbleness to take care of the needs of a Product team.  Can I out price my 1 core architect and 2 functional experts?  Can I provide them with ESOP that is way beyond others on the services side?  Can a developer in the product space get paid more than a manager?

Can HR deal with the above?  More importantly does HR have the mandate to make such exceptions?  What happens when a Product person moves to a Services Project – how do the incentives work?

For a services organization with thousands of people – it is not significantly important to solve the problem of at most a few hundred people working on products.  For the Product Organization every decision MUST be driven towards getting a great piece of software to the end-customer.

IT SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS don’t know their TOP DEVELOPERS

A developer in a software Product organization is the go to person to solve any problem.  It is extremely unlikely that a Services Organization even knows their top developers.  Developers of Software Products may often get paid more, and maybe more relevant to a customer implementation than any manager.  I have seen situations where One Top Developer has by himself been able to solve a problem that 15 managers, technical leads and developers could not.

The best Product Organizations will identify and nurture these developers.  IT Services organization will struggle with salary bands, designations, bonuses, and the best ones will find workarounds to reward these developers.  But that’s just what it will be – a workaround at best.

TRUTH 6: IT SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS don’t know IP management

Providing an IT Software Service to a customer and actually being the owner of the Software Product are very different perspectives.  When you own the Intellectual Property – here this refers to the Software Product; it comes with a different set of liabilities as well.

The questions an IT Services company may not ask – Did I leave a security hole in my software through negligence? My design is faulty and my code is badly written – did I disclose this to my customers?  If one customer is going to sue me for damages, does that mean all my customers will have to be informed? What if one of your developers has copied code that is Open Source – what are the implications? Etc. etc. etc.

Also, to develop IP, requires a certain amount of R&D (loosely used term here to indicate trial and error, waste and true R&D) – which algorithms will be most optimal? Which UI will be a hit with the customer?  Which features will be used the most?  And anyone who has been in R&D, knows that investment in R&D does not guarantee results and is often considered waste.  R&D needs an open mind and the results are often serendipitous.

Services organizations are experts at managing waste and reducing fat.  The Product organization actively produces waste and a CFO or an Accountant is often looking at the Product team (within the IT Services Organization) with itchy fingers to take that number off his xls sheet.  The Product team needs to experiment, to create and to throw away;  to improve things and hone it and make it better.  It is an idea generating machine that needs focus to create more value.  It is just such a throwaway piece that a product may need to make it standout, to break through the clutter and the noise in its space.

Related to IP is also a host of copyright, trademark and patents related issues.  The IT Services Organization needs to come up to speed with all of this if it is to create software products.  The last thing you need is for your Product to be successful and then to discover that someone else is using the same name or you have been slapped with a copyright infringement.

IP is the differentiator that can make your Software Product successful.

TRUTH 7: IT SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS grow through SIZE and PERSEVERANCE

IT SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS are all about growth through replication of success.  The growth mantra for this replication of success is to scale through resources, infrastructure, deployment on projects, managing bench, engaging with customers, building competencies, delivering software projects successfully time after time after time.  There is also a huge push on sales and winning large deals.

An IT Services business is also conservative by nature.  Due to its maturity, it is also a predictable business model.  Investments are made in people after knowing the size of Customer Projects that will be won. You assign resources on a won Project and then remove them when the Project is over.  When you don’t win the projected business and have a large number of unutilized resources (bench) you either cut salary or you ask people to leave after a certain amount of idle time.

In a Software Product Organization, at the first level, the Product should be able to talk for itself.  The word of mouth is critical.  For Example, for an internet product to grow, the problem is eyeballs and retention of the end customer on your internet site.  The primary focus is not on growing the number of people you have to hire and train.  In Services deals you may lose out if you are unable to show the customer your ability to scale up and get office space, people, training, rebadging, infrastructure, etc. on time.  In Product you will need to do a flawless job of your product implementation and ensuring your product Roadmap is road worthy.   You grow through better products, with backward compatibility, with presence on mobile, with analytics – and many other features around the product along with a science to replicate deployment methodologies and customer trainings.

Both IT Services Organization and Product Organizations scale and grow in very different ways.  An IT Services Organization doesn’t have the DNA for software products.  So, if a Services Organization chooses to go for Software Products be prepared for some gene level surgery.

TRUTH 8: IT SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS are not experts in their Customers’ Business

IT Services have today moved away from being just technology companies.  A website of an IT Services organization shows you industry verticals and domain solutions.  Full credit to IT Services companies for providing such exemplary service to its customers.  However, the customer still doesn’t expect the IT Services organization to know its business better than itself.

IT Services Organizations have honed Customer Service to a fine art.  There are processes and sub-processes to be followed.  You have frameworks like ITIL that continually reduce cost of maintenance and support.  The focus is on reducing cost of Business As Usual (BAU) activities.

With a Software Product it is different.  In the domain of a particular Software Product, customers expect you to know everything.  You are expected to know the domain, the technology, competing products, integration with other systems, mapping to business processes, etc.  You are expected to know how the beginner users and how the expert users will use and misuse your product.

All Customer Service comes from the knowledge of the customers’ business scenarios and not from a support management framework.  The ability to anticipate a customers’ problems and to be able to demonstrate thought leadership are critical to the success of a Product Organization.

Conclusion

If you are an IT Services Organization the biggest mistake you can make is to think that a Software Product is just another piece of software, which it is.  But that is not ALL what it is.  It is a completely new business.  So be prepared to reinvent that part of your team or else …

Posted on

Stories are Better Than a Feature List

You’re at an event, and you’re ready. You know your product inside out. You know the competition. You know the licensing terms. The deals. The partners. The competition. Technical details. Market details. Detail details. Regulations. Strengths. Compatibilities. Your head is stuffed. Crammed, just when – A customer comes to you. “I’ve got sixty seconds. Why should I buy from you?”

You spent years learning and studying and now you’ve got 30 seconds. You choke on your own knowledge.  In this situation, has your strength, your deep product knowledge, actually become a weakness? What do you do? How do you convey so much information in such a small amount of time?  It’s these situations, when a 100-slide PowerPoint deck or a technical demonstration is not possible, when it is critical to turn to the oldest form of persuasive communication in the world – the story.

Your customers are being constantly bombarded by myriad of marketing messages as well as other communication – emails, blogs, and social media. How do you make them notice your message and remember it when making a decision? The answer again is a story. Stories are powerful. Stories propagate thru centuries without any media coverage and advertising dollars. We hear stories in childhood and we repeat them to our children. And the story goes on. Consider these two announcements from two of the biggest product and SaaS companies.

Microsoft’s Jan 21, 2007 announcement

As Microsoft continues to deliver innovations to its unified communication and collaboration platform – which includes Microsoft Exchange Server 2007, the 2007 Office system with Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007, and has solutions in the pipeline such as the next generation of Microsoft Office Communications Server – Microsoft’s industry partners find that business is booming.

Google’s Oct 11, 2006 announcement

Ever found yourself trading email attachments with several colleagues, trying to collaborate on a document, only to have someone chime in at the last moment with corrections to an outdated version?  Today, at the Office 2.0 Conference in San Francisco, Google launched a solution to these collaborative and document-management challenges: Google Docs & Spreadsheets

Which one do you think is easier to understand and remember? Which is stickier?  The Google announcement has elements of a story as suggested by Heath brothers in their book Made to Stick.

Technical people are horrible at telling stories. It is tough for them to move from listing technical features to telling stories. Here is one way forward – apply to your writing the SUCCES framework suggested by Heath brothers in their book Made to Stick. They say a sticky message is simple, has an element of unexpectedness, is concrete and complete, makes an emotional connect and is told like a story. I strongly recommend the reader to get hold of the book and practice what the brothers suggest.

Here’s another example from GE – look at their site.

Their lead story isn’t about the products they sell or the event they were at. At the core GE stands for innovation and they tell us about their innovations not by listing their innovations in a bulleted list with awards and partner logos attached, but by talking about their rich history, their leaders, their visions and their journey over time.  It’s a rich narrative and something we can all learn from – the products are there but it’s not their lead.

You need to create your story or others will create it for you. – What is the narrative for Apple, What about Google or eBay? What would your narrative be? Remember to make your customer a hero!

Posted on

What’s your Sales Story?

Whenever faced by dilemma over any issue pertaining to sales and marketing, I recall a famous quote by Ben Feldman, who is considered one of the best salespeople in world history.

Don’t sell life insurance. Sell what life insurance can do.

Just by following this one mantra, Ben was able to insurance policies more than worth USD 1.8 billion in his life!

It would be unfair if I don’t mention Steve jobs here. Have you ever seen him selling Apple products? No! He would always sell you the idea of ‘how apple products can change your lives’. Watch his keynotes at the launch of iPhone or iPod and you will understand what I am trying to say here. Sadly I don’t see the same approach being used by Indian startups and product companies. Many of us are still struck at ‘Buy our product, this is the best; this is different; this is cheaper; this is awesome…..’.

Human brain is inherently averse to sales. The moment we realize someone is try to sell something to us, we tend to lose interest in the pitch, become defensive and start finding reasons why we don’t need the particular product (or service). So rather than doing direct selling using plain facts and figures, if you narrate a story about your product and how it can help fulfill peoples’ dreams, chances are they’ll listen to you. Research has proven that majority of the decisions are driven by emotions and not reasons. We don’t realize that because our brain tries to find logical reasons to justify the already made decision.

So triggering those emotions should be a critical component of company’s overall Sales story. Ideally the sales story should be centered around the following,

  •          Making people more powerful/ efficient/ potent through your product
  •          Making people passionate about your company and yourself
  •         Ringing alarm bells in peoples’ minds of losing out on something if they don’t buy your product
  •         Generating mystique and awe among people for your company and yourself
  •         Being just enough rebellious and loud to make some noise and stand out
  •         Developing trust among people for your company and yourself (damn important)

 

Let me take an example. I went for a sales meeting for some stakeholders from a global networking giant. Here is what I presented the first time,

‘WE are Company X. WEhave been doing this for so many years. WE have worked with companies like … WE’ll help your business grow to next level (x%). WE’ll help to save y% costs. We’ll increase your efficiency by z%, so on and so forth’

I got a good response but not a mind blowing one. We were asked to present to some other stakeholders in the follow-up meeting. I decided to try out something different this time. Here is what I presented,

‘YOU are Company Y. YOU have been doing this for so many years. YOU are doing good with a% growth, b% cost savings, etc. YOU are projected to reach here. What if we help YOU reach there. YOUR competitors are already catching up. We can help YOU leapfrog. We have already helped many companies to do the same. YOUR company is very good, we can make YOUR it awesome’  

Boom!! Applauses all around!

Notice the ‘We’ centric approach compared to ‘You’ centric one. Research has proved that customer relations are more long-run and stronger in the latter approach. I have complemented ‘company’ with ‘yourself’ because your personal branding goes hand in hand with that of the company, as people don’t perceive you much different from your company. I can’t think of any aspect of life where you don’t have to sell anything. I believe aforementioned points are relevant in every sphere of life- job interviews, user acquisition, b-school interviews, advertising, online marketing, presentations, proposals, VC pitches, etc.

For the founders, it goes without saying that you should have questions related to positioning, value add to customers, target market segments, key differentiators, etc. clearly figured out before you start creating your sales story. Answers to these should be Crisp, Short, Tangible and Simple.

Happy Selling !!

Posted on

7 tips to build a script :: a Step by Step guide

I wish it was mathematical. But it isn’t. There are unlimited combinations when building a story. That’s what makes it so much fun to consume – you never know how the storyteller tells it… 

So instead of giving you tips in a bulleted format – let’s build a script together.

What we know (or must know) before we start:

  1. This is for a 60 sec pitch video about a product called Glitch from Triton.
  2. They sell to Hotels. Their audience is clearly marked out.
  3. What the product does has been clearly documented.
  4. We need to bring out a call to action so they visit the product website.
  5. We are selling to Hotel people – they don’t have time to consume long form content – so the video should not be soggy and heavy – it should be light and brief. This means no more than 2-3 propositions. 

STEP 1: Start with a problem

” Guests want something – you deliver. Its simple. But when this doesn’t happen – your guest will get upset and then…. she’ll tell the world about it. The last thing you’d want is to read about such episodes on Social channels. “

Your product may solve many problems – choose only ONE to start with. Choose the problem that’s closest to your customer’s customer. Your customer cares about that. 

As you can see, we get to the problem quickly. The script doesn’t teach anyone. It just sketches out a scenario that will happen when the problem arises – customers will crib about your hotel’s service.

So here’s the first tip: 

TIP#1 – Get straight to the problem. Don’t beat around the bush. 

The easiest way to do that is to think like a customer and ask yourself – WHY MY FEATURE. Think what makes sense for you (you’re wearing the customer hat mind you). Think about that exact problem it solves. And then write that problem in simple words. Be direct and obnoxious if you have to – we’ll soften it later. 

STEP 2: Lets talk about our product a little

” There’s an easier way. Triton’s Glitch. Glitch alerts you when something has gone wrong in the service. And what you had to give up to … well… sort it out…. “

Part 2 of the script talks about the product. But not too much. We’re just making an overarching comment about the product. This is the main proposition or a product ‘tagline’ if you will. 

Tip #2 – Resist the urge to start talking about features here. Instead – make an overarching statement that comprehensively explains the product. 

This is around the 20 second mark. This is the time your audience will make a decision if this problem-solution pair interests them or not. 

Tip #3 – To optimize your video – ensure that the bucket personas as close to each other as possible. In every way… 

If you know what fish are in the river – you’ll be more successful in fishing. That’s because you won’t need to change the hook after every catch – you can just add the bait and cast your line again with the same hook. 

STEP 3 – Explain the feature a bit

” Whenever a service breakdown happens – all departments are instantly alerted and the right manager meets the upset guest, apologizes and offers a compensation. “

We’re going to show how the tool will work. We’re being absolutely real. This happens and then this happens and then this happens.

Tip #4 – use real cases where your customer has benefited and use that as the central pivot to build a story. This is another technique of writing a script – where you start with a situation and come back to the overarching product tagline. 

STEP 4 – play the second trump card

“What you get at the end of the day are clean reports that mark out repeated service breakdowns and compensations spent on them – across multiple properties.” 

We play our second trump card – a business benefit around data. We’re telling the hotel people that they can track and audit their expenses. No business likes to lose money and we chose to work around that sentiment when writing this line.

Tip #5 – sometimes your product may not have a ‘reporting feature’. In this case – try to bring out another feature or proposition. For eg. – X-app can also send you instant alerts…, Y-cloud will immediately shut down ports…, Z-service will raise a ticket… This is the second trump card. 

STEP 5 – Wrap it up

“No wonder a renowned Hotelier claims 18% jump in guest satisfaction scores since they implemented Glitch. Check it out today.”

We use some of our customer conversations and pick out a data point that one of the customers mentioned. This brings a reality check to the audience about the 2 claims we made earlier – step 3 and step 4. 

Tip #6 – Nothing convinces like data. Use as much data as possible in your stories. Avoid fairy tale endings and princesses and frogs. 

Tip #7 – Though I just said don’t use fable characters – one of the techniques is to start a story with a misdirection. So use these animals to start stories – not to end them. 

– – – – – – – – –

Here are 3 criteria I consider when evaluating a script:

  1. Is there any humor in the first 20 seconds. If the script doesn’t have humor – animation should. Or the screenplay. Or the audio – something must make the audience smile.
  2. After reading the script till the end – I should be able to recollect the first line of the script – without having to go back to the script. This means the script is light and catchy enough for my mind to be able to recollect what I read a few seconds ago. The information ‘stack’ on me is small enough for my mind to register and remember. 
  3. Word limit and sentence size. No more than 150 words and as small sentences as possible.

– – – – – – – – –

 Together now – this is the script in its final avatar. 

” Guests want something – you deliver. Its simple. But when this doesn’t happen – your guest will get upset and then…. she’ll tell the world about it. The last thing you’d want is to read about such episodes on Social channels.

There’s an easier way. Triton’s Glitch. 

Glitch alerts you when something has gone wrong in the service. And what you had to give up to … well… sort it out…. 

Whenever a service breakdown happens – all departments are instantly alerted and the right manager meets the upset guest, apologizes and offers a compensation. 

What you get at the end of the day are clean reports that mark out repeated service breakdowns and compensations spent on them – across multiple properties.

No wonder a renowned Hotelier claims 18% jump in guest satisfaction scores since they implemented Glitch. Check it out today. “

Posted on

Where is my story?

Most startups talk about product features and how they are better than their competition in terms of their offerings. They really don’t tell stories, however people remember stories for long and not the facts and figures. Most often than not, people say we are a startup, we don’t have paying customers and we do not have stories to communicate. The fact that they are developing a product itself is towards addressing a market gap that the incumbent solutions are not addressing – product creation story. Why don’t you communicate that as a story?

Let me give you a couple of examples.

I was consulting one of the product startups in the education space, which provides smart classrooms. They also were communicating features, benefits as a part of their communication, but they realized that they wanted to do stories. I asked them, why did you choose to develop this product and how did you go product startups about doing this?

In fact, when they wanted to develop their product, they understood the gaps in the market and they had an idea about how to address the gap but they weren’t very clear. In order to get the clarity, they interviewed hundreds of students and hundreds of teachers from across the country before beginning to design their courses. These interviews provided them with a clear idea of the instructional methods followed and what was lacking in it. With this, they started to develop the courses and after about 36 months of work, they have more than 6000 classrooms using their product. This is their product creation story, which they started to communicate very efficiently.

They also prided themselves on the usability of their product and its intuitiveness. I asked them, what does your customer feel about the usability of your product? They said that they are completely positive about the experience. I persisted, what do your prospects who are evaluating the product feel about usability? They weren’t very sure about it. That’s when, we wanted to influence their perception and we decided to do this as a story as well.

We decided that we would not demonstrate the product to the prospects; instead, we will install the setup and get a couple of volunteers from the school to play around with the product. Once they did that, they understood the usability experience, they felt a part of the experience and they started championing the product sales, which resulted in improved conversions.  This became their usability story, which is a part of their pitch now.

These examples are only triggers for you to identify where your stories are. I am sure that this would act as a starting point for you to find your stories.

Posted on

Quick Research / Usability Methods: Expert Usability Review

(Post 1 of a series on quick research and usability techniques. Start-up’s can use these techniques fairly easily to connect to and understand their end users better, as well as maintain usability standards on their products.)

ProductNation in collaboration with a few like-minded design professionals, recently put together an informal forum for designers, engineers, product managers & entrepreneurs in the Delhi NCR region. The objective of this forum was to evangelize and encourage a dialog around Design Thinking among the start-up community.

I conducted a short workshop on this topic at the forum’s launch event – a day long interactive meet up – hosted at the MakeMyTrip office in Gurgaon.

During the workshop, I introduced participants to the concept of Design Thinking and touched upon a few design research and usability methods that they could use to support design thinking within their organizations. A brief recap:

Design Thinking is an approach to design rather than a specific technique or method.
A core principle central to supporting design thinking is iteration. A ‘prototype and test’ focused approach fuelled by empathy for the people who will ultimately use the product, is recommended to be followed throughout the product development lifecycle.
There are several user research methods that can help companies connect to and understand their end users better. Guerrilla Research techniques in particular, are especially useful  in context to the start-up environment – Where time is of essence, budget is limited, teams are small, people are typically multitasking and playing multiple roles.
Guerrilla Research includes research techniques that can be done more quickly, with less effort and budget, as compared to formal or traditional user research techniques. Remote  / Informal Usability Testing, Man on the Street Interviews, Micro-surveys, Fake Doors, ‘Design the Box’ and Personal Inventory are a few examples of quick research techniques that can be learnt and implemented fairly well by a newbie researcher / anyone on a start-up team doubling up as a researcher.

In this first post, I want to introduce a discount usability engineering method called the ‘Expert Usability Review.’

Like Guerrilla Research methods, a Usability Review is an effective way to quickly identify usability and ease-of-use issues on a product. However, unlike user research, this method does not involve talking to end users at all.

What it involves is ‘expert evaluators’ reviewing a product, to identify usability and ease of use issues across different UI areas like Navigation and Structure, Layout, Visual Design, Interaction, Error Handling, Content etc. The experts are able to identify issues by drawing on their own experience in the areas of design and usability.

Subjectivity is minimized and issue validity maximized (or attempted to!) by ensuring that issues identified map onto existing and recognized design guidelines / principles / best practices or heuristics.

The issues identified through review, can then be fixed as part of an iterative design process. The kinds of issues that a Usability Review typically identifies are the ‘low hanging fruit’ or obvious usability problems.

Doing a review helps to highlight any aspect of an interface that violates usability and design principles.

The issues that surface through a review are different from the type of issues that come up while using user based methods like Usability Testing. So a review is a good complement to other user research techniques that may also be employed.

(More on typical issues found through Heuristic Evaluation and Usability Testing vs. Expert Reviews)

To demonstrate the type of issues typically found through a Usability Review, I evaluated the ‘Submit Ticket’ function on Freshdesk. Freshdesk is an online customer support software, targeted at small and medium sized businesses looking for a cloud based solution.

Here are some of the issues that I found:

Note: This is not an exhaustive review of the ‘Submit Ticket’ page, but a few example issues that help illustrate the type of issues that may be found through a usability review.
The products selected to be used as examples in this series of posts are products that are well designed in general. This highlights the importance of iterative design / the type of issues that can be unearthed even in well-designed products, by using various usability and research techniques.

issue observation 1issue observation 2issue observation 3issue observation 4issue observation 5issue observation 6The examples shown above are just a fraction of the issues that a Usability Review could highlight.
The success and effectiveness of this technique is dependent on the experience and skill of the reviewer. A review is typically done by three or four experts in the field of usability and design.

This method is best suited for start-up’s who have access to skilled and experienced usability / design professionals who can conduct a Usability Review.

Post 2 coming up soon, will introduce a related technique called ‘Heuristic Evaluation’.
With similar goals to an Expert Usability Review, a Heuristic Evaluation is a relatively easier starting point for novice researchers – Ideal for start-ups who don’t have a formal design / usability team in place, but want to try their hand at usability evaluation.

Are you a design thinker evangelizing or facilitating user research and usability methods within your start-up?

We would love to hear about your experience / answer any questions that you have about the methods that you used.

We also invite members of the start-up community to volunteer their screens / functions for use as examples in upcoming posts showcasing additional research techniques. Email me  at devika(at)anagramresearch.com to check whether your screen is eligible for selection. 

Posted on

Announcing ProductNation OutSights – Structured reports showcasing #MadeInIndia Software Products

As a lead up to India’s 66th Independence Day, ProductNation announces the launch of our OutSights Series. As there are a large number of thought leaders who have a lot of insights on a lot of topics, we decided that what we have, are OutSights.

We start this series with structured reports showcasing #MadeInIndia Software Products with Global Outlook. We will create a ready listing of software products #MadeInIndia that have the potential to take the international market by storm and may pose serious competition to established market leaders in their respective fields.

While this is not a competitive series, these reports will compare companies and their products, on the basis of published criteria. ProductNation intends to conduct in depth analysis of products submitted for review in order to arrive on the list of finalists, who make it into the final report. These reports will be published and syndicated across channels and will be available as a buying guide for those shopping in these categories. The finalists will also receive the ProductNation OutSights Badge which they can display on their web properties with pride.

Here are the list of reports that are scheduled for release between July, August and September, 2013:

  •      Enterprise Cloud Apps from India to watch out for
  •      Innovative Big Data Analytics Companies from India
  •      Indian CRM apps changing customer experience
  •      VAS providers from India for global telcos
  •      Amazing Indian software products with poor marketing

ProductNation welcomes all Indian software makers who wish to participate in ProductNation OutSights, for their respective product categories. Keep watching this space for eligibility and cut-off dates for entry.

For queries or suggestions for report categories write an email to [email protected]. Please submit your product details online before 20th July 2013.

Posted on

India’s Need For Entrepreneurs and the MindSet

In 1991, the second Independence of India took place – there was an opening up of the economy that led, in its own tortuous Indian way, to the opening up of the minds of a section of the population. The educated middle class that had till then either left the country for greener pastures or taken up jobs in the government or with the few MNCs operating then started looking around at opportunities that were being created in India. Entrepreneurship still seemed like something only two sections of society ventured into – those with family wealth or traditional business backgrounds or those without any other option namely, the roadside food shop, the barber and the small store owner. Very few consciously chose entrepreneurship as an option. Then, towards the end of that decade, a remarkable thing began to happen. Young educated middle class Indians suddenly started taking an interest in India: a host of environmental factors played a catalytic role in this phenomenon: the rise of Indian entrepreneurship in the US, the emergence of 1st generation educated middle class Indian entrepreneurs, the creation of aspirations in a increasingly mobile workforce and the media, increased availability of capital and the like. India started getting noticed in the West and India’s arrival on the global stage started getting reported in breathless hyperbole. However, all this euphoric talk about India’s growth and success hid the fact that crony socialism had quietly given way to crony capitalism which was as insidious. Governance and policy making took not just the last rows in the stadium that was cheering “India’s arrival” but were not even in the stadium! The penny naturally dropped on the India story.

Today, we’re confronted by the stark realities of India that the breathless comparisons with China and other countries had somehow managed to paper over. The hubris is slowly and painfully giving away to the realization that the parties celebrating India as a super power had begun too soon. And that there was, quite simply, an enormous amount of work to be done.

In 2012, as India enters its 66th year, our first prime minister’s rousing speech “Tryst with Destiny” is yet again worth reading. Are we anywhere close to redeeming the pledge made, has the new star of hope provided succour and whether hope still springs in the hearts and minds of all of us? While very impressive strides have been made in many areas, especially given the desperate condition at the start of our country’s birth, it is important that we keep in mind the fact that 15% of the world lives in India and over 68%  ie about 700million of our people live on less than US$2 a day. Over 17 million people are born (equivalent to the population of The Netherlands), an estimated 40million are unemployed, over 500,000 students graduate each year from various colleges and over  12 million join the workforce each year . The investment required to educate, train, and deploy these large numbers into gainful jobs is in the tens of thousands of crores. And remember, these millions of jobs have to be yet created! Now imagine the public healthcare, water and sanitation, education, travel, housing, electricity, entertainment, banking and financial services that need to be provided to these huge numbers assuming there’re jobs that lead to incomes being generated leading to consumption and investment. Imagine a scenario where tens of millions of young energetic citizens become disillusioned job seekers – the social upheaval possibilities are terribly explosive even to contemplate, particularly in our country.

For far too long, we have been plagued by poverty – of ideas, of ideology and of course economically. Misplaced socialistic policies in the early years of India ensured that poverty was distributed while cronyism ensured that a few made unconscionable amounts of money and enjoyed the trappings of power.

Jobs are created by entrepreneurs. Governments are facilitators and regulators to make sure that everyone’s playing fairly and by the rules that have been created to facilitate the creation of jobs. Wealth is then created by entrepreneurial actions. Only when wealth is created, can there be investments in creating the support infrastructure and services necessary for India to seriously consider redeeming its pledge. And a crucial pre-requisite for this is the need for an entrepreneurial mindset.

Change in every society, in every age, in every sphere of human endeavor has come about because some people, a minority, decided to put their entrepreneurial mindsets to work. And they were able to put their entrepreneurial mindsets to work because they were incredibly passionate about what they believed in. This minority is the entrepreneurial community. And while the term “entrepreneur” is generally used in the context of business and startups, it is important to realize that the entrepreneurial mindset has been, is and will be on display all around us.

Anyone with an entrepreneurial mindset dreams big, is interested in solving problems, seizes opportunities, is unafraid to experiment with new ways of doing things in order to achieve the dream, demonstrates leadership in creating new resources while marshalling existing resources, energizes people to work collectively to executing the dream, is conscious of the need to be fair, is respectful of the laws of the land, realizes the need to act with speed, engages and responds to feedback with a recalibrated approach, is unapologetic about effecting positive change by challenging a prevailing status quo and works incredibly hard. Possibilities of effecting change and making a difference to oneself and to others as against complaining about constraints (“I have no resources, I don’t know too many people, don’t have the knowledge or experience”) is what distinguishes those with the entrepreneurial mindset from the others. They spend positive energy in figuring out ways to create, seek and aggregate resources (team members, finances, networks) to make the possibilities come true. They are not afraid of failure but instead as Vinod Khosla says, “My willingness to fail gives me the ability to succeed”. In other words, keep shooting multiple arrows at the target.

What is it that drove Andrew Wiles for 30 long frustrating and difficult years to solve Fermat’s Last Theorem – ever since he first came face to face with it at the age of 10 – that had confounded mathematicians for over 350 years? What is it that makes a Reinhold Messner, the greatest mountaineer of all time, climb mountains on every continent, losing several of his fingers and toes and putting himself through extreme life threatening hardships such as climbing Mount Everest without oxygen? Surely, it wasn’t the money! What is it that made a significantly deaf, unschooled child grow up to become Thomas Edison, one of the most prolific inventors of all time with over a 1000 patents? Well before IPL, the stuffy establishment of cricket was changed forever in 1978 when Kerry Packer an Australian media baron challenged status quo by signing up 51 of the world’s top cricketers and introduced limited overs cricket under flood lights, with fielding restrictions, with coloured clothing, cheer leaders and the like. How come no one else thought of this before Packer? Would there have been a Nano if not for a Ratan Tata daring to think of a $2000 car for the middle class Indian?

The mightiest empire the world has ever known was shaken to its very foundations by the incredible demonstration of the entrepreneurial mindset by Mahatma Gandhi. For example, he had this to say about Swaraj “we must have a proper picture of what we want before we can have something approaching it”. Landing in India in 1915 as a 46 year old without any real understanding of India and without any mass following, but shaped by his South African experiences on the need for social justice, driven only by a set of passionate beliefs about the need for freedom for India, developed his concept of Satyagraha and energised people through his own unique blend of non-violent politics, lifestyle and use of symbols like the Dandi March.

We all have heard of Amul. It is India’s largest branded impact making organization Amul today impacts over 3 million milk producers and generates over $2 billion in revenues. It is world’s largest vegetarian cheese brand, India’s largest food brand and the largest pouched milk brand. It would be hard to imagine that an Amul could have been created without the entrepreneurial mindset and leadership of Dr Verghese Kurien, who led Amul as it innovated across the value chain. Amul incidentally was founded in 1946 before India’s independence!

From the few less than obvious examples cited above, it is clear that the manifestations of an entrepreneurial mindset are visible across very many areas of human endeavor.  As we contemplate an India that can  redeem its tryst with destiny, where jobs create economic security for hundreds of millions, we absolutely cannot ignore the seemingly intractable problems that confront us all as citizens. I have long believed that change in India will gain irreversible momentum when the generation born after 1991 enters the work-force. This is the generation that is confident, knowledgeable, technology savvy, is aware, well traveled and is impatient. Fortunately, India is the home to the largest number of such people anywhere in the world.

Resolving these problems requires the energizing of the entrepreneurial mindset that’s latent in each of us. Each of us can make a difference if only we dare to think differently. Changes in the way things are done in government, in politics, in society, in business, in education, healthcare are all eminently possible through entrepreneurial thinking with job creation and facilitation as the important outcome.

Here, therefore, is a question for us to ponder over:

Is it possible for us to imagine that each of us, in our lifetimes, creates – either directly or indirectly – a 100 jobs? Are there not 100,000 people – educated, experienced, entrepreneurial and energetic – who can each take up this challenge? Ten million jobs can be created by this group, indirectly benefiting 50 million.

If it is possible, it is do-able!

The Brihadaranyaka Upanishada has this to say:

“You are what your deep, driving desire is. As your desire, so is your will. As your will is, so is your deed. As your deed is, so is your destiny.”

Posted on

Explara – The new journey begins…

There are some companies which start their business with a bang but can’t sustain their growth. Then there are other firms who seize market opportunities and add value to it. These companies succeed in the Indian Market and then get ready to go Global, including taking on the hard to penetrate Asian Markets. The following Interview is of a company that has reached a turning point and  is ready to leave their footprint on the world markets. With new products in the making and a new brand name,they are ready to take Asia by storm. In discussion with Product Nation, Santosh Panda Founder Explara (formerly Ayojak) shares his strategy on the company’s plans ahead.

What was the vision with which you launched the company and how has the journey been so far? 

We saw a need in the small to medium event organizers to streamline their businesses. These organizers did not have any technology input/help and we thought we could provide the same through this platform. We launched Ayojak in September 2008 and after adding ticketing and other features to the product we upgraded it the following year. In 2008 we started with listing of events with 4-5 customers. At that time event organizers were using handouts etc. to reach out to their customers and could not anticipate how many customers would come for the event. In 2009 our turnover was 1.5 Lakhs with 5 customers that went up to Rs.30 Lakhs in 2010, clearly establishing that there was a need in the market for the product which we were offering. In 2011 we clocked revenues of Rs. 1.69 crores and since then have been growing at over 75% year on year and today we handle over 300 events per month.

What was the competition like in 2009?

There was hardly any competition, the infrastructure was getting built, we had to call customers and tell them how to use it. There were people who sold only a particular event and nobody was looking at the platform as a one stop solution for all event needs.

Ayojak has gone in for a rebranding exercise; do tell us about the same. What prompted you to choose a different name? 

Initially we were looking at solving a B to B problem, as in how to run an event, get details of people who are coming, collection of entry fee etc. We chose to address these problems for the event organizers. Therefore the focus was event organizers. But after some time the name which we had  chosen – Ayojak, was perceived to be more of a name for an event management company and thus called for rebranding. Also since we were operating only in India, even then people had problems pronouncing the name clearly.

We thought, that if we need to target B to C customers and look international we should have a name which will be easy to pronounce and at the same time clearly be able to define to the customers what we were all about.

We want to be known as the go to site for any event organizer. Hence an opportunity to all event organizers and customer to Explore hence – Explara

Which other markets other than India are you looking at operating in and why?

We are looking at Singapore, South Africa, Philippines, to begin with, since we have already operated in a tough market like India, the learning has been immense and we feel that we will be able to apply the same in other developing markets, which are equally challenging. Our foray into international arena would be by end July.

What are the new features which you are planning to launch to supplement your existing product lines?

In our view the next two features could very well be the game changers. Any event organizer today still has two problems, Firstly, to identify who all have come for an event and who are yet to come. Through a new product  – Entry Management, we will enable organizers through a smart phone to read the bar code/QR Code/NFC for every visitor attending the event, thus will at all times know the details of people who are in the event, yet to come or are outside the event.

Secondly, In India 30-40% of the attendees still come directly at the event. To help the organizers with this problem, we will give them an app based Box Office application which they can use to scan credit cards, debit cards etc, at the venue itself, thus ensuring that end moment gate collections are just as easy.

What advice would you give to product startups based on your early experience in the last few years?

Communicate clearly too all employees that you are there to stay, thereby keep reiterating to your employees the same message amplifying the fact that you are there for the long term.

Posted on

Lead, but consciously nurture talent

My wife forwarded me an article recently that Booz & Co. had written on India’s leadership challenge. You can read the full article here.

This confirmed something I have long suspected. While there are great leaders in the Indian business, there are very few great companies. Let me explain what I mean by that. In the business, we are in, i.e. IT, some companies have done very well financially, and yet, if you talk to employees at the very same companies, you will realize very quickly that folks aren’t happy. That they feel they are under-valued and under-utilized. That they have limited growth opportunities. That they are stuck in a rut. That has made for companies that can execute well, but cannot innovate.

That niggly attrition problem that so plagues the India IT business? Well, guess what, it doesn’t have anything to do with making an extra buck somewhere else. It has everything to do with having equally dreary workplaces that stifle growth. So if one has a choice to make a little more money doing the exact same mind-numbing work, well, that’s what one does. This is not just me talking. Check this out

I can empathize. I’ve been there too. 

So what’s the point of this post? After all this is supposed to be a blog about the software product business in India. 

The reason I write this is because we have an opportunity to create an eco-system of companies in India that are creative workplaces. Where individuals want to have fun and innovate. If we want world-class innovation out of India it has to start with the work culture. So to that end, I jotted down some thoughts on what we should be consciously thinking about.

Money is only a motivator in the short-term  – Many companies believe, IMO incorrectly, that giving people great compensation is more than enough. This thinking is especially prevalent in sales groups within companies. While you have to compensate your employees adequately and at wages that are competitive, money is really not a great motivator. And if this is the only carrot you have, there is nothing stopping your best employees from seeking greener (more carroty) pastures. 

MBAs are great managers(leaders), NOT – Many years back, just starting out in the workplace,  there was a clear hierarchy in new hires. There were the MBAs (preferably from IIMs) at the top of the heap, then there were the engineers (preferably from IITs) in the middle, and then were MCAs. The MBAs were fast tracked on to management roles whereas the rest of the people were expected to be the worker bees. That is a ridiculous way to build an organization. Many years later, the thinking persists and the results are evident. A degree does not make a great manager. Empathy and interpersonal skills, among other things, do. 

Doing a job well is not a predictor of management/leadership talent – I have seen this many times in my work life. In one particular instance, a person who was a fabulous individual contributor was an exceptionally bad team player. Well, he was elevated to a very senior position because of the fantastic work he had done as an individual contributor. I have lost touch with him so I don’t know how he fared. He is a very smart individual so I assume he figured things out but the company had done no favors to him or the company, by not grooming him for that role.

Just some thoughts on a topic I feel strongly about. I keep hearing of all the fabulous things that are happening in the Indian product eco-system and I am excited about that. But we must always be aware of the cultural baggage we come with. And the cultural baggage has a strong authoritarian component to it. Where commands are given and dissent is not tolerated. If we want to build a generation of leaders that can spawn multiple companies doing innovative work, this needs to change.

But all is not doom and gloom. Things are changing. One of my clients, Moonraft Innovation Labs, a UX design shop out of Bangalore has created a relaxed work environment to foster creativity. Titles are fluid, no assigned seating and an entire floor devoted to artsy endeavors. The quality of work they are putting out shows their approach is working. This is just one example. I am sure there are many more. The objective should be to drive the old command-and-control structure into extinction.

Agree. Disagree. Or have another viewpoint. Would love to hear your thoughts.

Posted on

Aurus Network CourseHub: Delivering on the promise of classroom-in-the-cloud

Aurus Network was founded in 2010 with the vision to make quality education accessible to masses at affordable prices. It is revolutionizing the way distance/online education is delivered. Aurus offers CourseHub, its flagship product, which is a cloud-based solution for educational institutions (higher education, test prep and training,schools, etc.) to capture, store and deliver (live or on-demand) lectures online. The company has been funded by Indian Angel Networks and is the recipient of Microsoft Bizspark 2012 Startup Challenge in cloud category. This is a review of their flagship product CourseHub and the company.

Introduction

When I was in college and bunked classes (which was fairly often; it was hard to get up for 8 am classes), what usually got me through the course were the notes photocopied from one of the studious guys of the class. It was not the best solution, but was good enough. Then, in my 3rd year, my college introduced a special studio classroom where one of the course professors used to hold his lectures – a sound-proof, sanitized room where the professor used to write on a paper with marker which would show up on screen for us, and for recording. The recording was supposed to be available as a bunch of video cassettes (yes, I am that old!) in the library. It was painful to attend these classes because they felt so unlike a classroom, and of course, it was too complex to watch these recordings so I never watched any, and photocopied notes continued to save the day.

I was 15 years too early! If it was 2013, I probably would be sitting in a regular classroom whose lectures were being recorded, and recordings were available right after the class, on my course portal online, in an easy-to-consume format on the various devices I own. Recorded (and indexed) lectures would allow me to have lectures-on-demand, which is so cool.

This is what Aurus Network offers through its flagship product CourseHub. It is a cloud-based solution for educational institutions (higher education, test prep and training schools, etc.) to capture, store and deliver (live or on-demand) lectures online. CourseHub is also offered to corporates to manage remote training sessions and schools for capturing their classes.

Aurus Network was founded in 2010 by Piyush Agrawal and Sujeet Kumar, and is based in Bangalore. 

The Product

Usage Scenarios

There are 3 primary usage scenarios for CourseHub:

  1. Lecture Capture: A lecturer captures his/her lecture for offline viewing by students or for creating blended learning content (for MOOC or other delivery mechanisms).
  2. Self-paced learning: A lecturer’s class is recorded to be viewed later by students to allow them to review the content at their own pace. Lecturer can edit the video and add pop quizzes and assessments online. This is usually used by universities.
  3. Extend the classroom: In this scenario, a lecturer’s class is streamed in real-time to remotely located classrooms or students. This allows the lecturer to have a very large classroom and have it closer to where the students are, without spending time in physical travel or money to build a single-location large classroom. This is usually used by training and test preparation centers.

For all of these scenarios to work, the capture device needs to be set up in a studio or classroom, which is a 1-time activity.  This is typically done with a server class machine connected to internet via high speed broadband connection (higher the speed, better is the quality of video streamed and stored) and a capture device (HD camera and microphone) connected to the machine.

Development

The product was conceptualized in Nov 2010 in response to the problem posed by their first client. Their V1 was released in Nov 2010 and V2 in Feb 2011 with the first deployment and roll-out to 10 centers across India. Their tech team comprises of about 10 people, who are working on various technologies like video compression, video streaming, computer vision, large scale load balancing and engaging front end technologies.

Most of the innovation in the product has been achieved by applying technically simple but important insights about customer behavior and preferences. For e.g., one of the USPs of the solution is that they are able to deliver almost HD quality videos at as low as 200 Kbps, while other conventional solutions (web conferencing, video conferencing) require atleast 1 Mbps or more for the same. This has been achieved by prioritizing the encoding parameters which matter more for the viewer while watching educational videos (like clear audio, sharp writing etc.) rather than doing a one-size fits all kind of video encoding.

Features

Some of the product features are as follows:

  1. Record video with any HD camera and microphone
  2. Enable automatic focusing on teacher with Intelligent software based tracker
  3. Teachers can teach in their natural style
  4. Schedule captures in advance
  5. Automatic archiving to create media library in the cloud
  6. Integration with client’s website
  7. Integration with Learning Management Systems like Moodle, Blackboard, etc.

Differentiators

There are a few standout features in the product which are well worth the mention:

  1. They can deliver HD video quality at 200Kbps, which makes this available to all students who have a broadband connection. Other solutions use much higher bandwidth (around 1 Mbps in some cases). The reason they are able to do this is because they can optimize their compression algorithms using their knowledge of what is important for students (clear audio and writing is much more important than clearly visible instructor for example).
  2. No human intervention is required (after initial setup) to capture, store and deliver lectures, they have fully automated the solution (including tracking the presenter, managing connectivity disruption, etc.).
  3. It is a cloud-based solution, so clients can try out their solution without any hardware setup.
  4. Aurus provides a home-grown Learning and Content Management System which allows their clients to manage users and lecturers, edit video lectures, and add quizzes and assessments to the videos. This means that the clients get a complete product.

Market Adoption

Typical market for CourseHub in India are test preparation and training institutes like Career Point, Career Launcher, etc. and universities. CourseHub is sold on a monthly/yearly subscription model, for example Rs. 20K a month can get you 500 hours of lecture time (1 lecture + 99 students in a 1-hour lecture will constitute 100 hours of lecture time) and 50GB of storage (500 hours will fit into 50GB). However, for someone in the market for such a solution, there are many options to choose from:

  1. VSAT based classrooms (Hughes is the biggest player) – These are expensive to set up and require dedicated hardware, but offer highly reliable infrastructure
  2. Internet-based classrooms (like Aurus) – Some of these require expensive studio setup, while others, like Aurus, can work with regular hardware.
  3. Ad-hoc systems: You can use youtube (or other video streaming sites), Google Hangouts and some local capture method to enable a large part of functionality of capture, store and distribute, and save some money. Operational hassle will be larger.
  4. No system: this is still not a critical need for educational institutes and a large number of these institutes just don’t have any solution in place.

For all these solutions, technology is an important piece, but so is the overall package (that includes setup, operations, essentially IT-free solution), since the clients are not likely to be tech-savvy enough to manage these technological solutions.

Currently, Aurus is the technology solution provider of type #2 – allowing their clients to create internet-based classrooms. They have about 30 clients out of which around 20 are actively using their system. They have a healthy pipeline of future deals, sales cycle tends to be long and seasonal (because of academic session dependency).

The Roadmap

With the goals of capturing more clients in India in different segments (Corporate, Training and Test Prep, Schools) and also expanding outside India, Aurus has an ambition pipeline of features and innovations.

Product Roadmap

Over next 12 months or so, Aurus intends to deliver the following to its clients:

  1. Launching a completely Do-It-Yourself version of CourseHub, which will allow institutes based out of India to use the product
  2. Launching more features to allow professors/trainers to effectively analyze student performance and take pro-active actions
  3. For professors, adding multiple ways to lecture capture in their classrooms – using a dedicated capture appliance, an android app or manual uploading

Technology Roadmap

Aurus hopes to deliver following technology enhancements in this period:

  1. Enhanced Capture – Enhance and decouple capture process from software so that the solution can work with any kind of capture device and hence can allow them to go global. This includes allowing the use of high-end camera (which ship with Android OS) and remotely controlling it from server through an Android app.
  2. Deep LMS integration – Current LMS integrations are very shallow since it uses LTI. Deeper LMS integrations will enable more complex use cases to be supported.
  3. API solution – Allowing API level access to the video catalog to enable integration into client’s portal will allow CourseHub to be more tightly integrate with client portals.

Competitive Landscape

Companies offering such a solution (capture, store and distribute – live or on-demand) are very hot in US. Echo360 is a Steve Case backed venture that focuses purely on universities and offers socializing the learning (learn in groups and collaborate using social tools) and flipping the classroom (use classroom to discuss and clarify doubts rather than lecturing). Sonic Foundry is a public company, and Tegrity is a McGraw Hill company, both offering solution similar to CourseHub.

One of the reasons for this space being hot is the fact that flipping the classroom is becoming the craze, and with MOOC (Massively Open Online Course) also being the next big thing; capture, store and distribute of video lectures suddenly seems like a key technology piece to allow everyone to offer a MOOC.

In India, it is still early days for flipping classrooms and offering MOOCs. CourseHub is primarily being used to extend the classroom, and make star lecturers available in remote classrooms, in addition to using it for self-paced learning by making recorded lectures available for later viewing. However, as Indian universities catch up to these concepts, Aurus seems to be well-positioned to be a leader in the space if it plays its cards well.

The Road Ahead

If I have to go to college again, I will probably bunk again (while managing the attendances somehow since they are mandatory now). When I do so, I will probably still go for photocopied notes because they are so brief and quick to go through. I would really love to look up appropriate pieces of short video clips of the lecture when I get stuck in the notes so having notes and videos cross-indexed will be so useful; also useful will be the ability to find other lectures on the same micro-topic and try to really understand it from different perspectives. Essentially, videos become any other type of content which can be searched, used and mashed up together to create learning assets that are reusable and easily consumable.

Aurus is a pure technology provider in education space. It becomes apparent when you go through their solutions, their brochure, or the cool features they showcase on their website – they are technology-heavy. However, education sector doesn’t yield itself well to pure technology players, primarily because technology is hard to use, and very few institutes have technical/IT teams on their rolls. So what they need is complete solution (including service, personnel, etc.) so that it becomes plug-and-play for them. Aurus needs to be on top of its clients’ complete technology needs and should be willing to offer various value-added services.

Blended learning holds lots of potential, be it universities, training institutes, corporates or schools. Aurus seems to be well poised to help them deliver on this promise through technology.